Ian of Quantum Learning and I thought it would be fun to get a bit of a discussion going around a quote. So, below you'll see our individual views on a quote from Friedrich Nietzsche. (Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher of the late 19th century whose views and arguments have led to much discussion and critique.) And, of course, we would love you to participate in the comments!
"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils, because it prolongs the torments of man"
Friedrich Nietzsche
Ian's view
I'm guessing Nietzsche was overstating for the sake of provoking a response, something he's quite well known for. Putting aside the exaggeration of just how bad he thought 'hope' is, I get the idea that this is a call for getting on with life, no matter how difficult. I think he's saying dreams for a better future just makes things appear worse than they actually are.
We've all experienced ups and downs on our journeys through life. Some of us have more ups and some of us more downs. The good times and the bad times always pass no matter what we do, but does hope really prolong the suffering we might experience through our inevitable difficulties?
I've experienced 2 types of hope, one I call passive hope and the other active hope.
The passive variety I've experienced in states of depression that come over me from time to time. In this state I find I'm hoping for things to get better but without any real idea what it would look like if it happened and without motivation to do anything about it. It's more like wishing to escape an unpleasant experience and wanting to be saved. If I believed in god as a deity, then I'd be looking to him to save me. I'm looking for someone else to make everything better. The problem, of course, is I don't have the openness to receive any help even if it was offered.
I think this kind of hope is a denial of the reality. It's passive. And yes, it prolongs my suffering.
But there's another kind of hope I experience. A desire for a better future with a clear acceptance that reality is as it is, yet an equally clear picture of what the future could be like. It's optimistic and comes with a motivation to change how things are. I have hope for a better world - for myself, my children and my as yet unborn grandchildren, and I'm not expecting anyone else to do anything about it. It's in my hands.
When I feel this kind of hope I'm not a victim, but a free willed human being with power to change the torments of man into something different.
Juliet's thoughts
For me this quote feels, well, just plain negative and dark.
In order to get to some understanding and reasoning of these few words, I started with the word "hope" and what it means.
For me, it would be that one believes a certain positive outcome is possible. "Hope" could only be undesirable if it was false hope. And this sentence implies that all hope is futile.
Perhaps one could approach it from the view that "hope" suggests one is looking at the future and holding only that, and the desires to be there, in mind. That continuous picture of a desired, but (at least currently) non-existent state will only serve to highlight the pain of the present. Perhaps the downfall of hope lies in its focus on the future and the resultant undermining of being in the present, which is where peace is to be found.
However, if one limits "hope" to a belief and not a future that is longed-for, one can hold it in the present and live in the moment. Hope can be used as a means of visualization and not a crutch. Perhaps the word "faith" (in a non-religious sense) would be less ambiguous.
But, if we don't have hope, what do we have? Do we give up? Or is this in actual fact a type of surrender and allowing? A space where we hand ourselves over to the flow of life and, again, to the present.
Whatever the case, I think that classifying "hope" as an "evil", is outrageous. Hope is positive - even if it is, arguably, not the best form of being positive. And, I say, rather keep even the "lowest form" of positivity, then fall to resignation or down further into negativity.
So no, I think that it is quite acceptable for hope to be in our lives. I certainly don't see it as negative.
In fact, I find Nietzsche's talk of the "torments of man" rather negative in itself. Life is life, ups and downs are natural. It is a flow.
In fact, my conclusion is that this comment can only be true if one believes that life has no meaning. And that, I will not agree with.
Thank you to Ian for taking part and I hope that you, the readers, too will give some views and join in a debate in the comments below.
Please support us by bookmarking this article on your favourite social network ( Stumble | Del.icio.us) |
Comments
|